Post by account_disabled on Mar 7, 2024 3:18:00 GMT -5
The Federal Police indicted this Tuesday (/) the former legal director of the PanAmericano bank, Luiz Augusto de Carvalho Bruno, for money laundering, fraudulent management, conspiracy, providing false accounting balances and other crimes. The PF is investigating fraud worth R$ billion and, with Bruno, there are now nine people indicted for the scheme. The information is from Folha de S. Paulo .
Also this Tuesday, the former president of Grupo Silvio Santos, controller of PanAmericano, Luiz Sandoval, was indicted for fraudulent management, providing unreliable information to financial institutions and forming a conspiracy.
Bruno's indictment came after statements by Silvio Santos to the Federal Police that the former legal director of PanAmericano was closely linked to Rafael Palladino, former director of the bank. Palladino, in turn, is named as the “intellectual mentor of the fraud”.
Last week, the PF indicted Wilson Roberto De Aro, former BTC Number Data financial director and identified as one of the scheme's masterminds, and Adalberto Saviolli, former director of credit and collections. Marcos Augusto Monteiro, formerly responsible for the transfer of portfolios, Eduardo de Ávila Pinto Coelho, former director of technology, and Marcos Pereira da Silva, from accounting, are the other defendants.
Also among the accused is Alexandre Toros, accused of being Rafael Palladino's assistant in the scheme. The investigations uncover a million-dollar loss caused by financial fraud in the granting of credit portfolios by the bank.
Another useful provision is the "integration" clause. This type of clause states that the contract establishes the entire agreement between the parties and that no oral representation or previous version of the contract is applicable. Obviously, this can eliminate a lot of discussion by limiting the agreement to the terms of the final contract. Of course, you have to make sure that everything that is important to you (or your client) is included in the final contract. Likewise, you should include a clause stating that any modification to the agreement must be in writing and signed by both parties, to eliminate any future claim that there was an oral modification to the agreement that is in dispute.
Also this Tuesday, the former president of Grupo Silvio Santos, controller of PanAmericano, Luiz Sandoval, was indicted for fraudulent management, providing unreliable information to financial institutions and forming a conspiracy.
Bruno's indictment came after statements by Silvio Santos to the Federal Police that the former legal director of PanAmericano was closely linked to Rafael Palladino, former director of the bank. Palladino, in turn, is named as the “intellectual mentor of the fraud”.
Last week, the PF indicted Wilson Roberto De Aro, former BTC Number Data financial director and identified as one of the scheme's masterminds, and Adalberto Saviolli, former director of credit and collections. Marcos Augusto Monteiro, formerly responsible for the transfer of portfolios, Eduardo de Ávila Pinto Coelho, former director of technology, and Marcos Pereira da Silva, from accounting, are the other defendants.
Also among the accused is Alexandre Toros, accused of being Rafael Palladino's assistant in the scheme. The investigations uncover a million-dollar loss caused by financial fraud in the granting of credit portfolios by the bank.
Another useful provision is the "integration" clause. This type of clause states that the contract establishes the entire agreement between the parties and that no oral representation or previous version of the contract is applicable. Obviously, this can eliminate a lot of discussion by limiting the agreement to the terms of the final contract. Of course, you have to make sure that everything that is important to you (or your client) is included in the final contract. Likewise, you should include a clause stating that any modification to the agreement must be in writing and signed by both parties, to eliminate any future claim that there was an oral modification to the agreement that is in dispute.